Welcome to Poem of the Day – Argument by Elizabeth Bishop
Elizabeth Bishop’s poem “Argument” invites readers to examine the emotional and psychological effects of a deep, personal conflict. With her signature clarity and precision, Bishop explores themes of misunderstanding, frustration, and the complexities of human relationships. This analysis will break down the poem’s meaning and explore the ways in which Bishop’s skillful use of language conveys powerful emotions.
Argument Explanation
Introduction to “Argument”
“Argument” is a poem that centers on a conflict between two individuals. The title itself hints at a dispute, but the poem’s deeper layers reflect the tension, pain, and emotional intricacies that emerge when people clash. Bishop presents this argument not only through the words exchanged but through the emotions and the weight of silence that often surrounds such moments of discord.
Structure and Form
The poem is relatively short, consisting of four stanzas. Each stanza works through different facets of the argument. The form is free verse, meaning there is no strict rhyme or meter, which allows Bishop to create a sense of unpredictability and rawness. The lack of a consistent structure mirrors the chaotic nature of an argument itself.
Theme of Miscommunication
Bishop delves into the theme of miscommunication through the portrayal of the argument’s progression. The two speakers are unable to truly understand each other, creating a cycle of misunderstanding. The argument seems to go in circles, with neither party able to find common ground or resolution. This lack of communication exacerbates the conflict and deepens the emotional divide.
One way this miscommunication is conveyed is through Bishop’s careful selection of words. She uses direct, sometimes jarring language to portray the intensity of the emotions at play. However, despite this intensity, there is also a sense of emotional distance—both speakers fail to connect on a deeper, more empathetic level.
Emotional Intensity
Throughout the poem, there is a palpable sense of frustration. This is particularly evident in the speakers’ attempts to dominate the conversation and assert their own perspectives. Yet, as the argument intensifies, both characters are left exhausted and emotionally drained, with no resolution in sight.
Bishop’s use of vivid imagery reflects the emotional toll the argument takes on the speakers. In one moment, she describes the argument as if it were a physical object that could be held or touched. This imagery highlights the weight of the conflict, emphasizing how all-consuming and overwhelming the exchange becomes.
Resolution or Lack Thereof
One of the striking features of the poem is its lack of a clear resolution. The argument doesn’t end with any definitive conclusions or apologies. This lack of closure mirrors real-life conflicts, where resolution is often elusive and relationships can remain strained. Bishop’s refusal to offer a tidy ending gives the poem an authentic, unfiltered quality, as many real-life arguments do not follow the neat patterns we might expect in fiction or traditional narratives.
Conclusion
Elizabeth Bishop’s “Argument” is a sharp exploration of the complexities of human emotions and relationships. Through her use of free verse, evocative language, and a focus on miscommunication, Bishop highlights the destructive potential of conflict. The poem’s lack of closure serves as a reminder that not all arguments have clear resolutions, and that emotional wounds can linger long after the words have been spoken. Bishop’s careful attention to detail and emotional depth make this poem a powerful commentary on the human experience, one that resonates with anyone who has ever experienced the frustration and isolation of a heated disagreement.
